Here's how to cover your butt, so to speak, when you get it all wrong - imply it's because you have that much influence over the direction of Big Brother.
From BBBA yesterday:
"BBBA’s ever watchful insiders have confirmed that 14 housemates will enter the house on opening night, with an additional four entering in the first week."
Followed up in the BBBA forums by the hallowed "watchful insider":
"Sources are not happy about our front page article, so I'm guessing the number of entering HM's will change before opening night anyway."
Yep, they'd rip it all up and start again. Really. They would.
Sad thing is there's a few sheep who actually buy this twaddle. Sadder still is the disseminators themselves even seem to buy it. Ok, ok, that part's not sad at all. It's hilarious.
Oh, and just a quick question, here... The sources are 'unhappy' they made it into print? Isn't that like, the whole point of sources?
UPDATE:
Look out, KFC. It's not just Big Brother that BBBA believes they have under their thumb. Now Three Mobile has apparently been forced to switch tack because of their stealthy undercover work.
Thirsty for more of Three's super-duper classified material (remember how excited BBBA got over a couple of blue squares saying "pack" and "premium pack"?) from the site every mobile-carrying Big Brother fan and their dog have been watching for weeks, they dug deeper. Right to the front page of three.com.au where they found details of a BB competition.
We've got no idea why there should be anything sinister about Three updating their website but
"Three have now removed the original link after it was spotted by eagle-eyed BBBA forumers"
Delusions of adequacy? I think so.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Sources are not happy about our front page article... LOL
"Three have now removed the original link after it was spotted by eagle-eyed BBBA forumers"
Post hoc ergo procter hoc. Tossers.
Tossers. Fact.
Hi Sweetie. Come visit my blog, I hope you're flattered.
Nobody is forcing you to believe any of the information at BBBA, it really is quite pathetic of you to have a go at BBBA for running a site that you don't even have to visit.
If you don't like what is served up there, then why bother giving BBBA the time of day? They aren't forcing you to believe anything at all, so why should you give two hoots? If you don't like it, then lump it! Alot of the information you claim to be "facts" made up by BBBA are actually put on the site as simple "rumours".
Why bother? This is the first time I have come across your blog, and I think you could contribute your time to worthier activities. If you despise the site so much and the sources that provide information to it, then isn't it better just to ignore?
If you don't like what is posted on that site, then you should simply leave it alone. It shouldn't bother you! I'm sure your time could be spent contributing to much greater things.
Regards, Anonymous. :)
Hey, Anon?
You don't have to visit this place, either.
I know I don't have to visit here, and I don't plan on visiting here anymore anyway, It pains my head oh so much to read so much bullshit.
Regards, Anonymous. :)
hahaha
she was banned from BBBA years ago and has never gotten over it.
what a loser you are mica, too funny.
Post a Comment